Posts Tagged ‘Apple’

Windows 7 Yeah whatever

Sunday, September 6th, 2009

Microsoft has come out with there shiny new Windows 7. I have heard nothing but praise for it. That is good but not a huge surprise after the disaster that was Vista. As far as I can see Windows 7 is Vista done properly. No doubt sales will be OK as many hold outs who avoided Vista might very well buy Windows 7. But among my technology buddies very few have jumped to the new version. Those who still use windows are nearly all sticking with XP not out of a fear of Windows 7 but more that they just can’t be bothered making the switch. Also it isn’t cheap and since it holds no perceived value they would rather not waste their money.

So what does this mean for Microsoft. Basically, in my opinion, they have missed the boat again. They aren’t listening to their audience and are putting out more product that serves Microsoft’s needs more than those of the public. There is nothing inspiring me to go back to Windows. Installing Windows 7 should be like opening a present on Christmas day; not a chore that very well could turn into a battle. When I turned on my Mac for the first time I did a little dance. I was lost and it was unfamiliar territory but with the exception of a few bumps it was a fun ride. So Windows 7 is no fun. People need more fun in their lives, not less. So my guess is that Windows 7 sales will pick up a few of the hold outs that are stuck with XP but won’t stop the bleed to Linux and Mac.

But as we all know there is a bit of a cash flow problem out there so MS sales would normally be down around now. Thus Windows 7 will at best probably fill in a hole instead of being a revenue home run.

If you want to see the long term prognoses for Microsoft just find out what your kids want to bring to university this year. A mac or a PC? I suspect that many will go with PCs but wish they had macs. A fair number will go with Netbooks as those are cheap as dirt; yet these kids too will wish for a mac.

Does this bode well for mac? Not really as much as you would think. Most people wish for a German car yet end up buying Japanese. So yes apple will benefit a bit but it is Microsoft who will be the big loser here.

Microsoft and the death by a thousand MBAs

Monday, May 25th, 2009

I heard a rumor that Microsoft just did a 4 billion dollar bond issue. If true this is odd for a company with around 25 billion in cash sitting in a big vault with Microsoft surfing the waves of gold coins. This is odd for two reasons. One is that right now is about the worst time in many many decades to be issuing bonds (unless it turns out people are looking for reliable bonds and Microsoft is taking advantage of that) and what profitable thing could Microsoft be planning that is worth having that kind of debt? The next part that make it odd is that Microsoft must have watched companies die after they cleared out their war-chests and raced off and bought something that turned out to be stupid. Time-Warner buying AOL would be a great example.

So unless Microsoft is getting into some completely unrelated business like mining they are probably buying something tech and something that will cost the better part of 29 Billion dollars. So you can cross out most American companies as the courts would jump all over Microsoft if they bought anything that left Microsoft a monopoly. The leading candidate rumor is SAP. I like this rumor so I will explore it as the probable future.

I hate SAP. Not a little bit but a huge amount. If I were to go into detail I could make a sailor blush so let’s just say I hate this hard sell, high priced, company that smells like the breath of the slimiest MBA that you have ever met and had do the double gun fingers to you. This is somewhat different than the origin of Microsoft. Microsoft was founded by a bunch of geeks who struck gold. This attracted many more geeks who continued to mine gold at a furious pace. Some business types snuck in and no doubt helped to keep the books straight. Also like any collection of humanity Microsoft was probably slightly populated by charismatic ladder climbers but seeing that many of the original founding technical staff had senior positions and money coming out their ears these ladder climbing backstabbers probably didn’t get the same traction that they might in, say a government department.

But I suspect that the senior management at Microsoft is starting to follow Bill Gates to the exit and are being replaced by those charismatic ladder climbers who don’t have money coming out of their ears. But they want money to come out of their ears and thus are looking for the big score that selling another few million copies of office just won’t provide. A merger with something big might just do the trick. SAP would seem to be a good fit. They are big and provide what I call a big bang solution. A big bang solution is where you throw out your entire set of old software and you bring in a whole new software universe that you must live with no matter what. SAP provides an end to end solution that seems to be very hard to escape from. Microsoft provides an operating and server environment that is also very hard to escape from. Combined and their customers may very well find themselves caught in the software equivalent of a black hole.

But I don’t think that this business strategy, (on paper probably the best merger in many years) can survive the human equation. SAP in theory would be the junior partner but the technically minded staff would almost certainly be overwhelmed by a tidal-wave of senior SAP personnel who come from a sales background. From a Machiavellian point of view this would be like shooting fish in a barrel. But while this might be fun for SAP I suspect that the disruption to Microsoft would be massive. Also many of its resources would be turned to making Microsoft a SAP selling monster resulting in their neglecting their bread and butter of Office and Operating systems. So long term SAP would go all Microsoft and Microsoft would go all dead. In the short term SAP sales would go up and Microsoft sales would be sustained. But long term Microsoft sales would fade and SAP sales would be dragged down with them. Then if SAP were to abandon Microsoft as a platform then the death to Microsoft would be accelerated and who knows what would happen to SAP.

In the short term, even without SAP, I think Microsoft is facing a huge problem. Windows version 7 is about to come out. Not one of my geek friends has come to be with wonder in his eyes with tales of some cool feature. Also not one of my geek friends has tried out Windows 7. In years past my friends would install the latest operating system as fast as they could get their hands on them. I am talking about pre beta highly unstable operating systems that would explode over and over. But after Vista turned out to be such a huge honkin’ dud most of my friends either went with Apple or are sticking with and are happy with Windows XP. So this same bunch are not even bothering to look at Windows 7. None of us have seen any compelling reason to make the switch. Not a single one. It is people like myself who advise many companies what they should do. Unlike Vista I won’t advise avoiding Windows 7 like the plague but I won’t be pushing it or using it myself. This says to me that Microsoft won’t get a crazy surge in sales. They will pick up some of the people who refused Vista but their sales will certainly be made up mostly by new computer sales and the fact that Microsoft comes with the computer by default. I still don’t commonly advise Linux as a desktop but Linux is getting closer to crossing that threshold where I would make that suggestion. What one must take into consideration is that I suspect that the bell curve of the Linux switch is a very sudden bulge. Thus when Linux gets just a little better it might not trickle onto the desktops of the world but it will flood.There are organizations such as the national police force in France who have made the jump and I suspect that many people will analyse situations like that to death and eventually be able to make the case for Linux. So some day the Economist Magazine will have a cover with a penguin (Linux logo) saying that any sensible company uses Linux. That will be the death of Microsoft and SAP will take a body blow if they have become part of Microsoft.

Microsoft’s sinking ship

Saturday, January 24th, 2009

Before reading this blurb, please understand that I am not a Linux zealot. There are many people out there who cross their index fingers at the sight of Microsoft products. I have used many of their products over the years and have generally found Linux annoying as a desktop and cannot foresee myself ever using it. Recently I have made the switch to Apple and continue to program for Linux servers and Windows desktops. My theory is that I will use the best product for the job at hand. So with this in mind…

I had a problem and that problem is that around a year ago my father bought an underpowered Acer machine with Vista on it. Even with the crappy Acer software removed and the trial of Norton AV removed the computer was a total dog. New, it booted in around 3 minutes and opening things like a browser or a word processor took so long you almost forgot what you were planning on doing when it finally got around to opening. So I was going to dumb it down to Windows XP when I thought I would try the latest Ubuntu….

I set up my father’s desktop with Ubuntu and it rocks. He can boot up and be in his email or on the web it a tad over a minute. I put the icons for Skype, Firefox, Word from openoffice and Email on his desktop so he probably won’t notice anything is odd at all. What is important about all that is that his computer now functions far better than it did with Vista and with no compromises as far as he is concerned. He now has no Microsoft software running on his computer.

I would say the worst risk that he runs with Linux is that he will buy a new printer that won’t have the linux drivers. Most of the mainstream printers will be fine though.

The security on the system is basically off the scale. As the person who gets called with every problem I don’t anticipate getting any calls.

Microsoft is in big trouble. Even if their new Windows 7 is reliable and not too demanding they will still be losing to free Linuxes. The only way for Microsoft to pull ahead will be to have some feature that has the status of Killer. Basically they need monkeys to fly out of their butts.

For the average user Linux would be a perfect set up. But there are two big holes. Games won’t work and once you step outside of the word processing, surfing, and emailing basics you are basically screwed. No software you buy at staples will work and any extra device you buy such as a web cam will not probably be installable by your average user.

So I would say that right now Linux is ideal for servers and old people. Microsoft’s other problem is that younger people want Apple products. So the main group of people who will continue to use Microsoft products will be the corporate world. That might be big but Microsoft will lose the hearts and minds of people at home and those same people will be quick to drag Linux and Apple into the workplace as fast as they can.

So as I have mentioned before, my long term forecast for Microsoft is a long slow slide into obscurity. This will take forever and a day due to their lack of debt and a captive market that will be slow to change; but like companies of the Sun and Novell types once the necrosis sets in the company has little chance to ever thrive again.

What stock advice comes from this? Well Linux is not really a company. A few companies like RedHat nibble at the corners of Linux for a few crumbs of profit but since the core product is free I don’t see this as a huge success business model. At best other companies that provide services that leverage linux will do a tiny bit better as their server costs will continue to drop. Microsoft’s fall from grace will be so slow as to be useless to bet against unless you are into 10 year short sided bets. Microsoft will occasionally announce that a Monkey has flown out of their butt but I suspect that these monkeys will turn out to be the stuff that usually comes out of people’s butts. So except for day traders I would say to just put Microsoft thoughts aside unless somehow they get their fire back. To test to see if that fire is real; look at your desktop and see if that firey product is rocking your world. If not then ignore the hype.

Lastly there is a path for Microsoft to be successful. It is a contradictory path. First is that the new Operating system must be stripped way down. Get rid of all the bits that are there to sell customers all the other products that Microsoft makes. Toss .net, sharepoint, database connectors, Active Directory stuff and everything. Make the operating system completely bare. I want an operating system that takes up less than 100M of drive space and uses a less than 50M when freshly booted. But make the OS very modular. If you want sharepoint interaction then you can add it. But when you add something to the OS don’t integrate it, keep it very separate. No more registry, windows, or system directories all piled up with crap. Right now most operating systems have a security model that will ask when the user tries to do something fundamental. Well make it so that these fundamental modifications are not required by newly installing software. Hard drives are basically free so if every application needs to have its own .dll files that is fine. Make the computer boot in like 5 seconds.

But next, and this is the near opposite of what I just wrote, make your OS do something with all those computers in the office. I could go into huge and complicated details about a solution, but Microsoft has the opportunity to do something really cool that they won’t be able to do in just a few years. Something that would cement their place in the computer world and blow Linux back a decade in their progress to win desktops.

AAPL

Wednesday, March 26th, 2008

Where did AAPL come from? Only a short while ago I thought apples reeked of poo. But a few things have changed my mind:

  • A few programmer friends who have switched or are switching
  • Vista
  • Leopard
  • BSD
  • Raw power of new machines
  • VMWare
  • They look cool
  • Hard core hackers are using them.

The first is that other people with similar needs to me are happy with mac. This is pretty straight forward until you realize that some of those programmers are still programming for windows and will for the near or possibly distant future.

Next Vista blows chunks and probably always will. XP will soon not be sold and that blows. Basically after working well with windows for over a decade I just can’t do the Vista thing. XP works great but I doubt it will be able to hold out until Vista’s replacement assuming it works.

Leopard works. This is key as I found previous versions of OS X to be a bit jerky. This seems to be fixed now.

BSD. The mac OS is built on BSD. In summary it is a pretty Reader Rabbit interface on top of BSD. What, you might ask, is BSD. Well you have probably heard of Linux and probably know that it is for geeks. Well BSD is for really really hard core geeks. The take away message for BSD is that it is for hard core security and performance geeks. That is a good foundation to build an operating system on.

Power. Raw power. The newest processors coming out have power to spare while not eating batteries which have also got more power. Also some other improvements like LED back lighting translate to longer battery life. RAM is cheap as dirt as well. This all adds up to something that can compensate for some of the drawbacks of all the eye candy that apple uses. In the past it offended me that the OS would spend so much time flickering lights at a huge cost to my sanity that apple computers were out of the question. Well now a new Mac Book pro has power to spare and thus the eye candy comes will almost no real cost.

VMWare. One of my favorite undervalued companies. They are making the big bucks from the high end server people but they also sell a $79 product for apple people that will allow you to run windows. Now if you set this up correctly you can use an apple with the apple OS and still run those super critical windows apps that you might not be able to live without. A good example in the business world is Outlook. There is no real equivalent to many of the features and plugins that you will commonly find in a larger corporation. Thus using a mac would potentially cut you off from your work. But VMWare seamlessly integrates your windows apps so well you might not even remember that they are windows apps.

There is no denying that when you pay the bucks for an AAPL you get some sex appeal. (Both you and the laptop). Apple has always had the artist’s market and they want cool.

But lastly for me (a smaller market segment but a potentially very influential one) I am seeing the really hard core hackers all using apples. By hackers I mean those people who make computers do things that would frighten you and impress people like me. Why are they using apples and not windows machines. Well for nearly all of the above but the BSD part is very important to them. But people like hackers and people like me are the ones who influence buying for really big companies.

Where is this going? Well in the next while I will be doing this experiment on myself. I will switch all my development to a Mac environment. This will be costly but interesting. If the experiment fails my kids will get the coolest laptop in school. If it works I will probably never buy another windows based machine.

So what does this all mean financially? Well in short is means that AAPL will be a good buy over the next few years. Microsoft could be building the best operating system in the world but they won’t have it ready until 2010 or better which is eons in the computer world. What apple has now appears to be damn good. If they can sell me then they will sell more and more. This translates to Microsoft selling less and less far sooner than I ever thought they would. Microsoft is not the sort of company that can shrink well. Like many companies before it a small shrinkage caused near death. The stock stops going up and they start to bleed employees who were expecting stock awards. The remaining employees start various civil wars and it just gets worse. Lastly with a falling stock acquisitions that might save it will slip away. Apple on the other hand might not be able to take success. They have played the underdog while simultaneously being a bunch of arrogant bastards. Success might cause problems with AAPL too but for a while the stock should sing.

So my plan is to buy an apple and see how it goes. If it works then AAPL will get a big long term buy probably at the expense of MSFT. If not then MSFT will be held and AAPL ignored. I will report the results of this experiment.